Monday, 5 November 2012
This motorcycle runs on air
Labels:
beyond blue green,
motorcycle,
occupy sydney,
runs on air
Friday, 2 November 2012
Remember Remember OpNov5 OpVendetta
#OpNov5
#OpVendetta
invites
Sydney citizens to air their grievances with their parliament.
When?November 5th,2012
Where?
Occupy Sydney,
Martin Place
Time?
Snap Actions 11am - late
Why?
Because there Is something terribly wrong with this country...
#NationalSecurityMeasures
#BudgetCuts #LimitedFreeSpeech #HumanRightsAbuses
#UraniumSalesToIndia #CoalSeamGas #Corruption * Today, let us be loud
and clear. CHANGE is coming...
HouseO charge Tenant 50% of Gross Income as Rent #SaveLibby
Occupy Sydney participants are flabbergasted but unsurprised as the now DOCS run State Government social housing provider Housing NSW -the largest landlord in NSW - tries to evict 19 year tenant , single parent Libby Ciesiolka from her home. Why?? Because she objects to their extortionate demand that Libby pay 50% of her gross income in rent. Despite several calls to Housing NSW and Minister Pru Gowards Office, Housing NSW or the NSW Government refuse to comment on this case or answer how many similar draconian cases are on Housing NSWs books.
Libby is a dedicated drug free single mum who has dedicated much of her past 20 years to the challenging task of raising 2 beautifully raised children in the oft challenging environment of a NSW HouseO Estate. She has been a sometimes outspoken advocate for educational and other local issues which affect her community.
At Occupy Sydney we strongly suspect that it is her outspokenness which causes her landlord to curiously dismiss her clearly relevant income documentation in favour of its own version of her income as more government departments act to terrorise the population into silence.
According to NSW Housing, these government generated statements are rejected evidence of income:
• First Employment Income Details: This document was rejected as incomplete by CSO Nik on 7 August 2012 because it did not state income per week and was not marked with a Company Seal.
• Second Employment Income Details: stating income per week as $385.58 and marked with the Company Seal
• Letter from Child Support Agency stating that entitlement to Child Support would cease on 18 November 2011.
• Child Support Agency Certificate under ss.116(2) of the Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988 (Cth): showing that child support remains unpaid.
• Centrelink Income Statement: 7 August stating eligibility for Family Assistance but that no income is received fortnightly it is received as a lump sum at the end of the financial year.
Libby’s son:
• PAYG income tax statement 2012 and 2011 with 2012 showing that Libby’s son’s income averages $71.83 per week.
• Second Employment Income Details: stating income per week as $385.58 and marked with the Company Seal
• Letter from Child Support Agency stating that entitlement to Child Support would cease on 18 November 2011.
• Child Support Agency Certificate under ss.116(2) of the Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988 (Cth): showing that child support remains unpaid.
• Centrelink Income Statement: 7 August stating eligibility for Family Assistance but that no income is received fortnightly it is received as a lump sum at the end of the financial year.
Libby’s son:
• PAYG income tax statement 2012 and 2011 with 2012 showing that Libby’s son’s income averages $71.83 per week.
Libby contends (and we agree that this is a fair minded viewpoint. Libby & the People demand that Housing NSW apply common sense , not draconian tyranny in its dealings with tenants.
1. The amount assessed as $423.41 appears to be calculated from the rejected First Employment Income Details and therefore rejects the Second Employment Income Details stating income per week as $385.58.
2. The assessment fails to accept Child Support documentation that shows that child support ceased on 18 November 2011 when Libby’s youngest son finished school and that the child support remains unpaid as the payer has withheld payments and cannot be located. This issue was discussed with CSO Nik who said that HNSW must continue to charge rent on Child Support until a letter stating that no Child Support is owed is provided. Libby expressed concern about being charged rent on unpaid child support and Nik said “you have nothing to worry about because Housing NSW is ‘not for profit’”. Libby contacted the Child Support Agency but they could not provide such a letter because money is still owed. Housing NSW continues to charge rent on Child Support and Libby has already paid 50% of that Child Support to Housing NSW.
3. No account was taken of Libby’s son’s income from paid employment. Instead the assessment charges rent on Newstart but he is not eligible for Newstart as he is only 21. Libby’s son is not eligible for a payment from Centrelink because Libby receives Family Assistance for him. Nor is he eligible for both Family Assistance and Youth Allowance as previously assessed by Housing NSW.
2. The assessment fails to accept Child Support documentation that shows that child support ceased on 18 November 2011 when Libby’s youngest son finished school and that the child support remains unpaid as the payer has withheld payments and cannot be located. This issue was discussed with CSO Nik who said that HNSW must continue to charge rent on Child Support until a letter stating that no Child Support is owed is provided. Libby expressed concern about being charged rent on unpaid child support and Nik said “you have nothing to worry about because Housing NSW is ‘not for profit’”. Libby contacted the Child Support Agency but they could not provide such a letter because money is still owed. Housing NSW continues to charge rent on Child Support and Libby has already paid 50% of that Child Support to Housing NSW.
3. No account was taken of Libby’s son’s income from paid employment. Instead the assessment charges rent on Newstart but he is not eligible for Newstart as he is only 21. Libby’s son is not eligible for a payment from Centrelink because Libby receives Family Assistance for him. Nor is he eligible for both Family Assistance and Youth Allowance as previously assessed by Housing NSW.
YOUR ACTION CAN SAVE LIBBY
- We urge all fair minded citizens to join the #SaveLibby Campaign as it rolls out on Sydneys streets.
- SIGN the PETITION HERE 10,000 signatures needed to be presented to Parliament http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/save-libby.html#fbbo
New Report on Legality of Occupy Melbourne Eviction
Occupy Sydney express our solidarity with Occupy Melbourne and continue with our joint Constitutional challenge against the use by the State of Police as an instrument to suppress political dissent.
A report by the Occupy Melbourne Legal Support Team (OMLST) which looks at the eviction of the Occupy Melbourne protest from the City Square 1 year ago.
New Report Discusses the Effects and Legality of the Occupy Melbourne Eviction from City Square on 21 October 2011
pinched from http://indymedia.org.au with gratitude |
One year on from the controversial eviction of Occupy Melbourne from the City Square a qualitative Report, Occupy Policing: A Report into the Effects and Legality of the Eviction of Occupy Melbourne from City Square on 21 October 2011, documents protesters’ experiences of policing. The Report complements these eye-witness accounts with an account of the relevant laws.
The Report makes several key findings including:
- The policing of protesters had harmful and lasting psychological, physical and political effects on individual protestors as well as the right to political expression;
- The various justifications relied upon by Melbourne City Council and Victoria Police to authorise their actions raise serious and as yet unresolved questions of law. There appears to be a lack of legal basis for the actions to forcibly remove Occupy Melbourne protesters from City Square on the 21 October 2011;
- There was extensive use of force by police in arresting and policing protestors, including the use of chokeholds and 'snatch squads'; and
- The police arguably acted outside of their legitimate powers and internal guidelines in detaining approximately 100 people pursuant to 'breach of the peace' powers. The place, conditions and length of detention varied, and protester statements attest to their disorientating and distressing effects.
The Report’s recommendations reiterate previous calls for an Independent Inquiry into the forcible removal of Occupy Melbourne.
The Report is published by the Occupy Melbourne Legal Support Team and is endorsed by Flemington and Kensington Community Legal Centre, and the National Police Accountability Project. It includes forewords from Cr Cathy Oke (Melbourne City Council) and Tamar Hopkins (Principal Solicitor, Flemington and Kensington Community Legal Centre).
‘The level of police violence on the 21 October 2011 shocked the national and international community. The experiences documented in this Report speak to excessive and unnecessary levels of violence,’ said Rhys Aconley-Jones, Report co-author.
‘The widespread and public inquiry called for by the Occupy Melbourne Legal Support Team to look at all levels of decision-making into the policing of the protest is not only necessary to restore the community's faith that the rule of law still operates in Victoria, but is required under international human rights law where allegations of human rights abuses have been made,’ Tamar Hopkins writes.
The Report is also available at: www.occupypolicing.org
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)